February
2004
Don't miss this
month's timely story ideas, direct dial phone numbers, and E-mail
addresses of these accessible experts!
PERSONAL
FINANCE/RETIREMENT
• This
is a Weird Year for Paychecks:
Most Employers are Planning to Give Bi-Weekly, Salaried Employees an Extra
Paycheck: Calculators at http://www.paycheckcity.com can Model Extra
Net Pay.
• Options
for Using Assets Tied Up in Your Home.
• Sharing
Retirement Savings at the Time of Divorce.
INVESTMENTS
AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT
• Innovative
Portfolio Managers are using Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) Flexibility
to Build Portfolios.
• What
Will Happen When the Economy No Longer Has the Administration's
Pre-Election Support?
• Gauging
the Growth of Your Personal Economy is the
Key to Creating Wealth.
PRACTICE
MANAGEMENT
• Bank
Trust Departments Find Bank's Own Broker/Dealers
May Currently Offer Better Approach to High-Net Worth Clients Through Separate
Account Platforms.
•Brokers
with Hybrid Books of Business -- Both Retail and
Institutional -- Will Find Boutique Firms, Not Wirehouses,
Are Best Bet for a Career Move.
• Media:
Sign Up for Free Subscription to In-Depth, Financial Education
Resources.
ELDER
CARE
• Long-term
Care Insurance Design Secret:
Overbuying Daily Benefit Is Excellent Strategy.
PERSONAL
FINANCE/RETIREMENT
This is a
Weird Year for Paychecks:
Most Employers are Planning to Give Bi-Weekly, Salaried Employees an Extra
Paycheck for the Weird Year: Calculators at http://www.paycheckcity.com can
Model Extra Net Pay.
2004 is a weird
year when it comes to paychecks. Every dozen of years or so, the
Roman calendar adjusts by adding an extra Thursday and Friday.
This requires some adjustment in a company's paycheck policy. There
are two ways to handle this:
Dock the Paychecks All Year and Kill Morale:
A company can maintain that its employees get an annual salary
and to make the extra paycheck, dock every paycheck all year
a small amount to make up the extra paycheck, or
Announce an Extra Paycheck and Be the Hero:
The American Payroll Association found in a recent study that 96%
of respondents said their companies will be giving exempt employees
27 biweekly paychecks in 2004 with no reduction in the per paycheck
amount during the year. Most of the companies cited good will
and fairness toward employees as the reasons for the generosity.
(www.americanpayroll.org)
Industry experts say companies should not be tightwads on this
matter, because the extra week also reflects extra revenue for the
company. The "Hero" approach
increases an employee's annual salary for the year, but only for 2004. The
alternative is to damage salaried employee moral by reducing each paycheck.
Employers and employees can use the "Weird Year" calculator
at http://www.paycheckcity.com to model their net pay under these circumstances.
If unsure of your company policy on this matter, contact your payroll
department.
PaycheckCity.com offers unequalled employee self-service
tools for paycheck management. The FREE PERSONAL FINANCE CALCULATORS
at this site are used by individuals and organizations of every size
to quickly and accurately answer paycheck-related questions and to
compute paychecks under a variety of circumstances. More than 1.5
million page views take place each month on the PaycheckCity.com
site and visitors stay an average of 10 minutes each. It is the most
visited site for payroll-related support on the Internet.
Contact
Jon Bohnert, jon@symmetry.com, 480-596-1500 x. 103.
Sharing Retirement
Savings at the Time of Divorce.
A financial
planner on the divorce strategy team is essential to evaluate the
scenarios represented by opposing counsel as to the future financial
viability of the divorcing spouses. The higher earning spouse will
find that their retirement assets come immediately into play as
an asset pool of interest to the other spouse during divorce negotiations.
The division of these assets will be part of any final divorce
decree. It is important to remember that no matter what the divorce
decree says, if a spouse is expecting a share of a partner’s
retirement assets, their attorney must follow through after the
divorce by filing a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) with
the court and then submitting it for approval to the spouse’s
company. It is the company’s approval, NOT the court’s
or judge’s that determines when and if the spouse will get
those retirement assets.
Plus, if a spouse retires, remarries or dies before the QDRO is
drafted (and approved by the company), the agreement that a spouse
reaches relative to the retirement account division in the divorce
may be unenforceable.
Equally important to the actual drafting of the order is making
sure it gets approved by the company. It can take months for the
company to decide if a QDRO meets federal regulations as well as
each company’s own unique requirements.
Do not underestimate the time or attention that a QDRO requires from the
attorney, the client and the financial advisor.
A financial advisor can run various scenarios to help a client
decide which of a number of negotiating stances need to be considered.
Life insurance on the higher earning spouse should be considered
as spousal support replacement.
If the divorce involves an older woman, re-employment is questionable
because of experience or health. Sophisticated financial projections
from the opposing spouse showing an apparently equal division of property
can leave the lower, or non-earning spouse, destitute within a few
years. Divorcing men and women simply do not have equal income-producing
potential. The older woman is often without substantial skills and
experience and will require a greater share of the property to cushion
the income loss she suffers at divorce. The goal is to provide the
older homemaker with equal standards of living after the divorce.
Donald W. Nicholson, Donald W. Nicholson & Associates,
Ltd., Wilmington, Delaware, is a fee-based financial planning
firm serving the retirement and wealth management needs of professionals
and business owners for almost 30 years. His son, Donald W. Nicholson,
Jr., is a partner in the business. Contact them at 302-529-1500.
E-mail dwnicholson@unitedplanners.com -- http://www.nicholson-associates.com.
Options for
Using Assets Tied Up in Your Home.
You have just
retired and discovered that you need an additional $700/month to
supplement your income and fund living expenses. Your home is worth
$400,000; and has no existing mortgage and you have investment
assets of $250,000. To use the assets represented by your home’s
value, your options include reverse mortgages, interest-only mortgages,
and home equity lines.
A REVERSE MORTGAGE allows seniors to access the equity in their
home without having to make mortgage payments, qualify for a mortgage
under traditional income and credit underwriting guidelines, or
give up title to their home. With the most commonly understood
method, the homeowner can get a lump sum amount of money at closing
(similar to a traditional cash-out refinance). In this case, the
interest payment on the funds are “deferred” and
added on to the loan balance. Even if the interest is accrued to the point
where the balance on the mortgage exceeds the value of the home, the homeowner
retains title to the property and is never obligated to make a mortgage payment
in their lifetime. If the homeowner sells the property, the mortgage must be
paid off. Otherwise, once the last surviving spouse dies, the title to the
property is transferred to the estate and the estate must repay the remaining
balance on the mortgage to the mortgage lender. Reverse mortgages can also
result in credit lines and monthly advances.
Hefty fees and closing costs are the major drawback of a reverse
mortgage. In this example, the client would be subject to about $11,000
in up-front fees and closing costs (not out of pocket, but rolled
into the loan amount), and an additional $5,000 in “service fees” throughout
the life of the loan. The interest rate on a reverse mortgage is
variable; with current rates in the 3.3% range (2% above the yields
on one-year Treasury bills).
An INTEREST-ONLY ARM MORTGAGE allows
the homeowner to take a lump sum amount of money, place the funds
into an investment account and draw on the investment account to
make the monthly mortgage payment and provide the additional $700
in monthly income that is needed. The interest rate on the mortgage would
be variable at 3.25% (2% above the LIBOR index), and the closing costs
would run approx. $4,500.
Assuming the initial loan amount is $200,000, and the return on
investment is at least 1% above the mortgage rate (4.25%), the funds
should last for 19 years, or until the client is 84 years old (at
which time the client could refinance and repeat this strategy).
In this scenario, the client would save approx. $11,500 in service
fees, points and closing costs when compared with a reverse mortgage.
However, the client would need a good credit rating to qualify
for this strategy, unlike a reverse mortgage that doesn’t
evaluate credit history as a qualifying factor. Also, if the
client had no investment assets beyond their home, and no other
source of income, the variable interest rate would probably be in the
4% range (2.75% above the yields on one year Treasury notes).
This homeowner choosing a HOME EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT of $200,000
pays little or nothing in fees or closing costs, but their variable
interest rate would be tied to the Prime rate (currently 4%). Conceptually,
and assuming the Prime rate remains 4% for the life of the loan,
the client could draw $700/month from this line of credit for up
to 16.5 years. However, the chance of the Prime rate staying at 4%
for 16.5 years is highly unlikely. The likely scenario is that the
funds would last for 13-15 years (until the client is 78-80 years
old), assuming a credit limit of $200,000.
Gibran Nicholas is the President
and founder of Nicholas & Co. Mortgage Planning Solutions,
a full service mortgage lender and broker in Ann Arbor, MI. Phone:
888-608-9800 Email:Gibran@NicholasCity.com Web
Site: NicholasCity.com
INVESTMENTS
AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Innovative
Portfolio Managers are using Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) Flexibility
to Build Portfolios.
Advisors may
be missing the boat if they haven't looked into ETFs for asset
allocation applications. Some mutual fund managers now use ETFs
as a way of handling idle
cash, particularly if they must stay fully invested. These managers
can invest in SPDRS, and take a position in the S&P index for
quick placement of new money. But usually the managers will not
hold these ETFs long term.
Those advisors practicing strategic asset allocation, creating
diversified portfolios, are using ETFs for certain market sectors
because of the low cost, efficiency, and the ease of implementation.
Tactical asset allocation specialists use ETFs to concentrate in asset classes
that are performing well, and avoid asset classes out of favor. The ETFs
make trading in and out of a sector seamless, convenient, and offers liquidity
that is simply not available in other vehicles like mutual funds.
Equally important, ETFs are clean from a regulatory standpoint.
Like stocks, they can be traded intra-day and are not subject to
the same regulations that are now likely to limit mutual fund liquidity.
ETFs are here to stay. It's important for all investment advisors
to evaluate their place in client portfolios.
PMFM, Inc. principals are Tim Chapman and Don Beasley, with offices
just outside Athens, Georgia. Jud Doherty, CFA, manages the marketing
and distribution of 401k Toolbox, a service that provides discretionary
management as part of its advice product. PMFM provides money management
services for its own clients, for the asset held by plan participants
in their 401(k) plans, as well as for the clients of other asset
managers. The firm has always offered a tactical asset allocation
strategy and has a lengthy
history of good risk-adjusted performance, preserving the value of client
accounts over the difficult last four years.
Tim
Chapman, 800-222-7636, timchapman@pmfm.com, www.401ktoolbox.com
What Will
Happen When the Economy No Longer Has the Administration's Pre-Election
Support?
Election years
are always good stock market years, as the incumbent administration
works diligently to prop up the economy before the November elections.
Nonetheless, the realities are that the U.S. economy is faced with
an enormous past deficit, enormous current national budget imbalance,
and dependence on foreign purchase of U.S. Treasury bonds. In the
last bond offering, 45% of the available bonds were purchased by
foreign entities.
Investors need a plan if the post-election economy does not meet
expectations and the U.S. does not remain a favorable place for foreign
investment. Under this scenario, interest rates can only go up. High
interest rates will put a significant drag on the equity and bond
markets at the same time.
Look for investment advisers who are searching now for investments
that will protect investors under a post-election scenario. Your
advisers should be looking at alternative investments. These non-traditional
choices may include gold, mortgage REITS, energy and commodities.
All investments have their dangers and all have their rewards. In
the turbulent, post-election, times ahead, be aware of your options.
Henry I. Montgomery, CFP
-- Planners Financial Services, Inc., 952-835-9000. Minneapolis,
Minnesota. Registered investment adviser and subsidiary company
Montgomery Investment Management, specialize in the management
of no-load mutual fund portfolios for individuals and retirement
plans designed to protect capital by reducing risk. pfshim@usinternet.com.
Gauging the Growth of Your Personal Economy
is Key to Creating Wealth
Land, labor,
and capital — these are the things of which dreams are made — at
least according to Adam Smith in his groundbreaking treatise, The
Wealth of Nations. In Wealth, Mr. Smith identifies these elements
as the sole means of production and thus, the sine qua non for
building the wealth of a nation state. He goes on to point out
that the economic well-being of a nation state is a direct outgrowth
of the manner in which these elements of production are employed.
Yawn, you say.
Economics 101, you say. But step back for a moment and extrapolate
Smith’s
notion to your personal situation. As our own nation states, each of us generates
wealth through the elements of land (loosely translated as your residential
real estate), labor (the skills you ply in the marketplace) and capital (the
disposable income you set aside and convert to capital through wise investing).
And, if we’re smart about it, we focus on increasing the productive capacity
of our land and our capital, and decreasing the reliance on the productive
capacity of our labor. The result — more free time and more bandwidth
to pursue the broad array of interests that lights our fires.
As you approach tax time and engage in financial forensics of the
year gone by, try a little exercise. Take a blank sheet of paper
and calculate the return on your three elements of production: land
(how much did your home increase in value over the past year based
on comparable property sales in the neighborhood?); labor (what did
your job yield in wealth creation last year?) and capital (how did
your portfolio perform and remember, net of costs and inflation!)
and see how your personal economy fared. Then, consider what changes
you could make in 2004 to increase your personal GDP and shift its
reliance from limited sources (i.e., labor) to unlimited sources
(i.e., land and capital).
Paula Chauncey, CFA, Managing Partner, être
llc, 617-716-0257 works with individuals, and their closely held
businesses, to develop and execute wealth-building strategies. pchauncey@etrellc.com.
PRACTICE
MANAGEMENT
Bank Trust
Departments Find Bank's Own Broker/Dealers
May Currently Offer Better Approach to High Net Worth Clients Through Separate
Account Platforms.
It is the bank's
broker dealer side, not the trust departments, that now offer programs
widely considered more "defensible" in addressing a high-net
worth client's short- and long-term investment needs. This is fueling
interest by bank trust departments in the value proposition of
separate account platforms. Consider these differences:
· Generalists vs. Specialists: Most traditional bank trust models offer
a generalist approach with an approved, but limited, stock list (to avoid conflict
of interest with the bank's loan portfolio) to investment management clients.
A separate account platform offers clients specialist teams from multiple boutique
investment management firms. This makes it possible for brokerage divisions to
have a widely and well-diversified portfolio since each separate account manager
is paid to know as much as possible about a very narrow aspect of the market.
This also plays out in the economic commentary and market outlook that comes
from a variety of specialty managers in the brokerage model, compared to the
standard, generic viewpoint of the trust model.
· Manager Monitoring and Surveillance: Separate account platform providers
monitor and measure separate account managers to ensure continued performance
and adherence to the investment model for which they were hired. The separate
account platform provider has no personal relationship with the recommended separate
account managers and can terminate under-performers at will. It is unlikely that
trust departments would ever terminate themselves if they were under-performing.
· Technology: Technology has changed the face of how high-net worth monies
are being managed today. Formerly an individual investor needed $10-$20 million
to access an appropriate number of specialty managers for diversification.
· Now, given that technology has reduced the cost of administration,
manager minimums are, on average, around $100,000 per style.
Bottom line, for bank trust departments to remain competitive,
the adoption of a separate account platform seems inevitable.
To reach Brian Carroll, Head of Separate
Accounts, FundQuest, Boston, call Joanna Flynn at 617-526-7307.
FundQuest is the leading provider of customized Web-based managed
account platforms for financial institutions interested in moving
their representatives from commission-based to fee-based product
sales. jflynn@fundquest.com.
Brokers with
Hybrid Books of Business -- Both Retail and Institutional --
Will Find Boutique Firms, Not Wirehouses, Are Best Bet for a Career Move.
In the past,
retail brokers who had a percentage of their book of business with
institutional clients have been allowed to service them on a retail
platform with a payout that was substantially higher. But at the
large firms, that trend has changed. New broker/dealer policies
make it impossible for some wirehouse brokers who have a hybrid
book to stay at their present firm as well as move to another wirehouse.
Brokers in this situation must choose between their retail or institutional
business, give up one segment of their client base resulting in
a lower payout, or leave their firm in order to keep their clients.
Leaving the firm brings up the issue of where to go. Large "brand name" broker
dealers are not looking at brokers with hybrid books. If the broker dealers
do look at "hybrid-book" brokers, they would require the moving
broker to give up the institutional accounts, as the new BD would already
have brokers covering those same accounts.
Brokers in this situation must put their allegiance to big name
firms under scrutiny. Seldom is the marquee value of a big name firm
the reason for a broker's success -- they just think it is. Hybrid-book
brokers will find their style is better suited at a boutique firm
where there is unlikely to be account duplication. The boutique firm
offers a better quality of work life, more flexibility in how they
conduct their business, and very often, better payouts. Hybrid brokers
are unaware of how good life can be at boutique firms and often turn
their noses up at such opportunities. The likely lack of account
duplication, allowing the moving broker to keep their institutional
clients, may make all the difference.
Mindy Diamond is President of Diamond
Consultants, Chester, New Jersey, a search firm specializing
in recruiting wirehouse and regional firm brokers with trailing
12-month’s production between $200,000 and $5 million.
Her firm assists these financial consultants in evaluating opportunities
in the industry and introduces them to other wirehouses, regional
firms, banks, or independent broker-dealers. Mindy can be reached
at 908-879-1002, or mdiamond@diamondrecruiter.com.
Media: Sign
Up for Free Subscription to In-Depth, Financial Education Resources.
Members of the
media may contact Forefield.com to receive full time access to
Forefield's educational resources on financial planning topics.
If it's a financial topic that
a client would ask a financial planner about, Forefield has a written explanation,
many with illustrations, in their web-based, client-centric financial planning
and advice product. Forefield's information is current, concise, compliant,
and available to the media at no cost.
Simply e-mail William Davenport at wdavenport@forefield.com
to be included on the permanent subscription list and you will
receive your complementary password shortly.
ELDER
CARE
Long-term
Care Insurance Design Secret: Overbuying Daily Benefit Is Excellent
Strategy.
Consumers buying
long-term care insurance tend to focus on one aspect of policy
design - the benefit period*. Instead, they should focus on the
daily benefit**.
It's almost
always a good idea to buy a higher daily benefit than perhaps they
think they need, even if it means buying a shorter benefit period
than they want. Here's why:
Inflation hedge: About half of all policies are bought without
inflation protection. This is a huge design flaw, as the average
purchase age is now under 60, and most people on claim are between
ages 80-90. But, even among purchasers who buy inflation protection,
this protection may fall short. Why? Policies offer only a 5% inflation
rate, which may not be high enough. Overbuying the daily benefit
today further protects consumers against the ravages of long-term
care inflation.
Preserving assets: Consumers are most likely to collect more with
a higher daily benefit, even if their benefit period is shorter.
For example, a policyholder has a heart attack, followed by a stroke.
She receives a year of long-term care insurance benefits, then dies.
In this case, it didn't matter if her benefit period was two years
or lifetime (unlimited). She was only collecting for one year. A
higher daily benefit reduces or eliminates any out-of-pocket expenses
during a claim, preserving assets and income. If consumers are nervous
about a short benefit period, and fear they will end up having a long-term
care claim that goes on for years, they need to know a mitigating fact:
any unused portion of the daily benefit is not lost – it extends the benefit period. For
example, a $200 daily benefit/three-year benefit period policy, covering daily
care costs of $100, will last six years. The $100 dollar unused portion of
the daily benefit is not lost - it waited for the policyholder resulting in
a three-year benefit period policy actually paying out for six years.
Marilee Driscoll, President, Long Term
Care Learning Institute, (508) 641-9393, Plymouth, Mass., the
leading, objective authority on long term care financing, and
author of "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Long Term Care
Planning.”
BACK TO TOP |