April
2004
Don't miss this
month's timely story ideas, direct dial phone numbers, and E-mail
addresses of these accessible experts!
INVESTMENTS
AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT
• Gift
to a Conservation Trust Can Enhance a
Family’s Net Worth Over Time and Reduce Property Taxes.
• Asset
Allocation Simply Does Not Mean the Same Thing
to All Investment Managers.
• Merging
Equity and Mutual Fund Portfolios at Retirement?
Do an In-Depth Analysis of Holdings in Each.
• Investors
Should Ask Advisors Hard “End of First Quarter” Questions
This Year.
• Where’s
Waldo? … Finding Your True Portfolio Costs
(Take 3 -- Revenue Sharing).
PERSONAL
FINANCE/RETIREMENT
• Job
Transfer in Your Future? Make Sure You Check Out the State Tax
and Cost of Living Differences Before Agreeing to a Salary.
• A “Mortgage
Reduction Investment Account” May Be Better
Than Paying Off Your Mortgage.
• Civil Marriage For Same Sex Couples Still
Requires Defensive Financial Planning.
PRACTICE
MANAGEMENT
• Consider
Availability of In-Depth Education and Training
When Choosing a Separate Account Platform.
• Media:
Sign Up for Free Subscription to In-Depth, Financial Education
Resources.
INVESTMENTS
AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Gift to a
Conservation Trust Can Enhance a
Family’s Net Worth Over Time and Reduce Property Taxes.
The family owns
a modest house on five acres next to five acres of ocean front
land that abuts the house. The two separate pieces of property
have been in the family for years, the second lot purchased as
an investment. The rapidly appreciating undeveloped property, now
worth $2 million, has huge real estate taxes, too high for the
family to pay easily. They have two options:
1. Sell the undeveloped five acres in a straight real estate sale.
Create a tax event ($2 million x 20% cap gains tax for a $400,000
payment to the IRS.
2. Sell the undeveloped five acres to their town, a land bank or
a conservation trust for fair market value.
Assume that the sale
nets the family $2 million. They can then rollover the $2 million
into a 1031 exchange (through a qualified intermediary) to acquire
income-producing real estate, an exchange allowed by the IRS 1031
code. Assuming a conservative return of 3% from their income-producing
property, they will see a boost of $60,000 a year in their own income
that can be used to help pay real estate taxes on their primary residence
or for any other purpose. Equally important, they will see a drop
in their property taxes.
The benefits to the family are multiple:
1. There is no cap gains tax on a sale to a land bank or conservation
trust – it
is deferred for the life of the property owners, and deferred at their
death.
2. Their primary residence is much more valuable because
it is located next to land which can never be developed in any
way.
3. They have saved $400,000 in cap gains, assets that are now part
of a rental property that is contributing both income and appreciation
to the family’s
bottom line. A 6% appreciation of the $400,000 savings would mean $800,000
more to the net worth of the family within 10 years.
4. The family received neighborly good will for protecting the
neighborhood against development.
5. When the heirs inherit the property, the $400,000 in saved cap
gains from the original exchange effectively becomes a tax -free
loan from the IRS and is forgiven at death.
The family also has the option of taking a cash-out mortgage on
the exchange income producing property, still with no cap gains tax,
to use for diversified investing.
Pearson Financial Services, Dennis, MA offers a fully
integrated wealth management process, incorporating investment,
retirement, financial and estate planning specialists under one
roof, serving clients as their family's office, designing and
implementing strategies to protect and distribute their wealth
and highly appreciated property. Seth Pearson, CFP 800-385-7925
Asset Allocation
Simply Does Not Mean the Same Thing
to All Investment Managers.
Talking about
active asset allocation for retail mutual fund clients is viewed
as heretical because of accepted studies that say active managers
can't beat the market. An advisor advocating a balanced mutual
fund portfolio of 50% in stocks and 50% in bonds is never held
to the standard of being required to beat the market. The critics
further advocate buy and hold rather than tactical asset allocation.
Yet sophisticated, wealthy clients use active management for protection
of capital through conservatively managed, low volatility hedge
funds and are perceived to be very savvy.
Some would
even say any type of active management is market timing but that
approach casts a wide net that captures the likes of Warren Buffet,
who recently reported that he's holding billions in cash because
he can't find any stocks of value to buy. Holding cash instead
of stocks? To many "efficient market" theorists, that
is market timing.
The goal of tactical asset allocation is to limit downside volatility.
The use of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) in mutual funds has improved
active asset allocation dramatically. Advisors moving between ETFs
have the options of changing sector allocations rapidly. They are
being paid for their judgement of which ETFs to hold and for how
long. The goal is not to beat the market, but to get a reasonable
return with lower volatility. Over time, if active ETF portfolio
managers limit the downside volatility, they may beat the market.
Thirty years ago, critics said that even if active asset allocators made
good investment decisions, taxes and trading costs would undermine the process.
Things have changed. Neither taxes or cost are obstacles when an active asset
allocator is managing an IRA account.
Look for an advisor using an ETF strategy who has the time, energy
and inclination to determine which asset classes are really doing
well and which are not doing well. This active asset allocation with
ETFs brings conservative, wealth preservation hedge fund techniques
to the retail mutual fund investor.
PMFM, Inc. principals are Tim Chapman and Don Beasley,
with offices just outside Athens, Georgia. Jud Doherty, CFA,
manages the marketing and distribution of 401k Toolbox, a service
that provides discretionary management as part of its advice
product. PMFM provides money management services for its own
clients, for the asset held by plan participants in their 401(k)
plans, as well as for the clients of other asset managers. The
firm has always offered a tactical asset allocation strategy
and has a lengthy
history of good risk-adjusted performance, preserving the value of client accounts
over the difficult last four years. Tim Chapman, 800-222-7636, timchapman@pmfm.com,
www.401ktoolbox.com
Merging Equity
and Mutual Fund Portfolios at Retirement?
Do an In-Depth Analysis of Contents of Each.
Going into retirement
requires a detailed analysis of your goals and dreams, understanding
where you stand financially, figuring out long-and short-term objectives,
calculating how much money you will need in retirement, and creating
a strategy to accomplish the goals.
A major issue for many couples facing retirement is portfolio rebalancing
when one partner has held a portfolio entirely in stocks and the
other entirely in mutual funds. The issue that crops up, almost always,
is whether the equity assets are replicated inside the mutual fund
portfolio and whether any duplication creates overweighting in some
investment sectors.
The second issue to address is whether the risk levels are appropriate
for the risk tolerance of the merged portfolio at a time when protecting
capital is paramount. Very often, successful stocks are heavily weighted
in mutual fund portfolios. After all, everyone is reaching for performance.
This also produces a great deal of duplication within individual
mutual fund portfolios, even though were purchased for purposes of
diversification.
Your job and that of your advisor is to drill down into the mutual
fund portfolio contents and make changes where stock duplication
throws the risk tolerance out of balance as the couple looks at retirement
income needs.
The advisory interview and due diligence process on the existing
portfolio will result in a more efficient and balanced portfolio
to meet the couple’s
financial needs going forward.
Donald W. Nicholson,
Donald W. Nicholson & Associates,
Ltd., Wilmington, Delaware, is a fee-based financial
planning firm serving the retirement and wealth management needs
of professionals and business owners for almost 30 years. His
son, Donald W. Nicholson, Jr., is a partner in the business.
Contact them at 302-529-1500.
E-mail dwnicholson@unitedplanners.com -- http://www.nicholson-associates.com.
Investors
Should Ask Advisors Hard “End of First Quarter”
Questions This Year.
Portfolio performance
always generates phone calls from clients to financial advisors.
This month, the questions about first quarter 2004 reflect a new,
deeper understanding of the impact U.S. politics, foreign policy,
budget deficits, and personal debt have on the investor’s
personal portfolio. As well, investors are more aware of the impact
current economic issues will have on future generations, their
children and grandchildren.
When investors see lower portfolio results than last year, they
ask hard questions. Well-managed portfolios are up slightly for first
quarter. The market is off slightly. But investors who have not lost
their short-term memories of what happened in 2000 and the following
two years have become more critical, and more questioning. Headlines
on the volatility in the market have unnerved some investors.
Advisors are finding their clients are more serious, better informed
about issues that can impact their portfolios, and looking for ways
to protect those portfolios. But the questions, true to human nature,
remain -- “Why aren’t
we making any money?” Advisors must be available and willing to discuss
this with investors. There are no easy answers, only hard questions. In the
asking and answering of the questions, comes a depth of relationship between
advisor and client. Do not hesitate to ask questions about your portfolio.
After all, it’s your money.
Henry I. Montgomery, CFP -- Planners Financial Services,
Inc., 952-835-9000. Minneapolis, Minnesota. Registered
investment adviser and subsidiary company Montgomery Investment
Management, specialize in the management of no-load mutual fund
portfolios for individuals and retirement plans designed to protect
capital by reducing risk. pfshim@usinternet.com.
Where’s
Waldo? … Finding Your True Portfolio Costs
(Take 3 -- Revenue Sharing).
Investors have
a new question to add to the due diligence agenda in vetting potential
financial advisors and the underlying firms in which they do business — one
that has a direct and strong bearing on the integrity of investment
advice…
It came to light recently that one of the nation’s largest
distributor of mutual funds, or what you may more commonly know
as a brokerage firm, pocketed $180 million in 2002-2003 from a
line item called “revenue-sharing payments.” A
tidy sum to be sure. What is this lucrative item? Turns out that revenue-sharing
payments are payments made by mutual fund companies to brokerage firms that
favor the companies’ funds in recommending investment selections for
investors. Also turns out, according to an SEC survey released in January of
this year, that 13 of 15 brokerage firms reviewed favored “revenue-shared” mutual
funds in selecting funds for individual investors.
Though rife with potential conflicts of interest, there is nothing
illegal about a revenue sharing arrangement on its face; indeed,
it happens across a broad range of industries and businesses. What
is instructive to learn vis-à-vis
our large fund distributor is that its revenue-sharing arrangements were not
disclosed to individual investors even as their portfolios were populated with
preferential funds. Viewed another way, the $180 million in revenue sharing
payments posed a $72 invisible tax on each of the 2.5 million individual investors
served by the firm and provided a theoretical $18,000 windfall for each of
the firm’s 10,000 employees. What’s wrong with this picture?!
As you sit down with your broker for a first quarter state-of-the-state
review of your portfolio, take the opportunity to explore where his
or her allegiance resides with respect to revenue-sharing arrangements.
The results promise to be informative.
Paula Chauncey, CFA,
Managing Partner, être llc,
617-716-0257 works with individuals, and their closely
held businesses, to develop and execute wealth-building strategies. pchauncey@etrellc.com.
PERSONAL
FINANCE/RETIREMENT
Job Transfer
in Your Future? Make Sure You Check Out the State Tax
and Cost of Living Differences Before Agreeing to a Salary.
A job hunter
in Tennessee was considering a transfer move to California. He
did some cost of living and state tax research to ensure that any
salary offer would be adequate for an employee moving from a state
with no income tax and a low cost of living to a state with a high
income tax and a much higher cost of living.
To prove the point that he needed a higher salary offer to stay even, and in
fact, to get ahead, he first went to the free, on line calculators at http://www.paycheckcity.com,
and plugged in his current pay stub information to see how accurate the calculators
were. Satisfied by their accuracy, he then modeled his paycheck as if he were
in California, factoring in the withholding taxes impacting his net pay. He
used the California calculator to figure the cost
of the new state income tax. In addition, he used the PaycheckCity.com calculators
to model both his Federal and California tax exemptions and discovered that
he could increase his
take home pay by legally increasing his exemptions. To estimate even more take
home pay, he also used the PaycheckCity.com calculators to run different scenarios
on his health, dental and
long term disability contributions, changing them from family to the lower
employee-only rates because of a recent divorce.
Then he prepared a spreadsheet showing the state tax differences, plus on line
city and regional cost of living salary comparisons he found. His colleagues
had predicted that he would not get the increase.
After returning from his interview, his prospective supervisor
asked what he would need for salary in order to make the move and
accept the offer. He told the prospective supervisor that he would
need a 20% increase based on his hard data and research. He got it.
PaycheckCity.com offers unequalled employee self-service
tools for paycheck management. The FREE PERSONAL FINANCE CALCULATORS
at this site are used by individuals and organizations of every
size to quickly and accurately answer paycheck-related questions
and to compute paychecks under a variety of circumstances. More
than 1.5 million page views take place each month on the PaycheckCity.com
site and visitors stay an average of 10 minutes each. It is the
most visited site for payroll-related support on the Internet.
Contact Jon Bohnert, jon@symmetry.com, 480-596-1500 x.
103.
A “Mortgage
Reduction Investment Account” May Be Better
Than Paying Off Your Mortgage.
The advice to move into retirement with no mortgage has been the conventional
wisdom for many investors throughout the years. For many, this could mean making
extra principal payments on a 30-year traditional mortgage loan at the time
investors should be increasing retirement savings. For others, this could mean
drawing down retirement assets to pay off the remaining mortgage balance. Both
choices have negative long-term implications. The question becomes: Is it better
to have no mortgage and no money in the bank; or is it better to have a mortgage
with enough money in the bank to pay off that mortgage when if it makes financial
sense to do so?
The only way to become truly debt free is to have no need or dependence
on debt. For example, a senior citizen who owns a home with no mortgage
may have no debt; but if they also do not have enough cash flow to
fund their living expenses and achieve their goals in life without
dipping into credit cards or their home equity, they are not debt
free. They are not debt free because they are not free from the burden
of having credit card debt or the burden of worrying about money.
The conventional wisdom tells homeowners to become house rich and
cash poor by working hard to pay off their mortgage by making extra
principal payments. Rather than paying off their mortgage, consumers
may be better able to achieve their goals by refinancing to an interest-only
mortgage at or before retirement.
This allows
the consumer to make interest-only payments, diverting the freed
up cash flow into an investment account that yields more than the
after-tax cost of the mortgage (often which in in the 2.5% - 3.5%
range.) The investment account can be called a “mortgage
reduction account” and the funds could be used to pay off
the mortgage at some point in the future if the need arises to
do so.
This strategy also allows the client to maintain liquidity in case
of emergencies and accumulate greater wealth than if they were to
follow the traditional route of making extra principal payments on
the loan. The old conventions about mortgages must be examined carefully
by the investor and their financial advisor. The equity and debt
in your real estate are for many the most significant asset or liability
they have and can be managed with creativity even into retirement.
Gibran Nicholas is the President and founder of Nicholas & Co.
Mortgage Planning Solutions, a full service mortgage lender and
broker in Ann Arbor, MI. Phone: 888-608-9800 Email: Gibran@NicholasCity.com Web Site: NicholasCity.com
Civil Marriage
For Same Sex Couples Still
Requires Defensive Financial Planning.
Regardless of
what states do to give same-sex couples the right to marry, as
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court ruled in November of
2004, existing federal and state laws currently restrict access
to the full spectrum of marital benefits. Same sex couples in Massachusetts
who marry are insured the right to make medical decisions on behalf
of an ill spouse, access to hospitalized spouses, the right to
determine final burial instructions, and access to approximately
300 state provided marital benefits. However, proposed federal
and Massachusetts state constitutional amendments may potentially
strip away or redefine marriages as civil unions. As a result,
same sex couples who marry must still review and update their current
financial and legal plans to ensure that they are properly protected
and create strategies to compensate for gaps in coverage due to
continuing inequities.
Existing Federal and State laws, which recognize only the union
of a man and a women as legal spouses, restrict access to the full
spectrum of approximately 1,400 marital benefits. The federal Defense
of Marriage Act (DOMA) currently prevents access to approximately
1,100 federal rights and benefits, while state DOMA-like laws restrict
portability across state lines by refusing to recognize the marriages.
DOMA’s create a parallel system of benefits due to differences
in eligibility for certain benefits and different tax treatment.
In Massachusetts, which at this time is a test case, same sex married couples
will have access to certain rights and benefits which will be exempt from Massachusetts
income, gift, and estate taxes, but will continue to be taxable federally.
Same sex couples will be entitled to file a joint Massachusetts income tax
return but will be required to file separate federal income tax returns. Asset
transfers among spouses will be entirely exempt from MA gift and estate taxes,
but transfers above $11,000 will be subject to federal gift and estate taxes.
Same sex couples will be able to file a joint gift tax return for MA gift tax
purposes but not federally. Same sex couples will not be able to receive federal
government benefits and protections, such as spousal Social Security and Medicare
benefits. Tax preference spousal IRA rollovers and pre-retirement death benefits
from a deceased spouse’s defined benefit plan will continue to be denied
to surviving same sex spouses. Employer paid health insurance premiums for
same sex spouses will be exempt from MA income taxes, but will be federal income
taxable.
Same sex couples need to review their current financial and legal
plans to ensure that there are no gaps in their protections due to
limitations in actual benefits.
They must factor
in the different availability of coverage and tax treatment for
various transactions, and update insurance coverage for lost retirement
benefits. Same-sex couples will continue to require additional
estate planning documents as a back up when traveling and as a
safety net against any future changes in federal and/or state law.
Susan Burns, CFP®, Principal of Snug Harbor Financial
Planning, Inc. in Marshfield, MA, provides creative solutions
to complex financial problems for women business owners and lesbians
through long-term comprehensive financial planning relationships.
She can be reached at 781-834-4099 or snughbrfin@aol.com.
PRACTICE
MANAGEMENT
Consider
Availability of In-Depth Education and Training
When Choosing a Separate Account Platform.
Separate account
programs manage risk by bringing together different investment
managers who can focus on performance for specific allocations
in a diversified portfolio for a client. Simply introducing a separate
account platform does not mean that a broker will embrace the shift
from transaction-based to fee-based business immediately. There
are several requirements to successfully integrate a separate accounts
platform at an institution:
1. Initial and ongoing corporate buy-in at the top level of the
organization introducing separate accounts, requiring accountability
and commitment to the product line
2. Ongoing training and education for the broker about a fee-based practice
and its benefits
3. Product definition of separate accounts and how such accounts can meet
the needs of a distinct group of clients.
A good managed account platform will provide sales educators who know and
teach the sales techniques of a process-based solution. Superior training
from a managed account platform provider offers the following:
· Large number of individuals who can provide in-person sales and marketing
training.
· Web-based client relationship tool kit for a fee-based consultant, customized
for each institution, providing specific direction on use of the business
development resources included, such as:
o clear, easy to understand "how to" details -- filling
out forms, keeping records
o prospecting letters
o investor-targeted presentations about separate accounts, their features
and benefits
o tools to identify a target market within the investor universe for
separate accounts
o suggestions for developing referrals
o aids for planning and implementing events and promotions to encourage
fee-based separate account sales.
· Hands-on sessions with brokers, either presented by the
separate account provider, or in concert with the institution's training
department.
· Participation in certain client meetings with brokers to increase probability
of closing, helping brokers gain confidence in the process-based sales
style.
· Immediate phone access to experts who can answer all questions that
occur
· Access to a money management firm's separate account experts, who are
invited to participate in actual client meetings or to present practice
management sessions.
· Online client management system for archiving client profiling information
as well as client account information and performance data updated
daily.
Impediments to sales of separate accounts can be overcome by senior management
support, together with creative, thorough training of brokers jointly
by the institution, the separate account platform provider, and the separate
account managers.
Successful
programs also establish a level playing field for fee-based sales
through favorable compensation plans for their sales teams. The
fee-based business model is rapidly becoming a “way of life” for
brokers, as it delivers a defensible solution for most clients’ financial
needs, compared to transaction-based business, which in many cases
does not.
To reach Brian Carroll, Head of Separate Accounts, FundQuest,
Boston, call Sarah Anderson at 617-526-7391. FundQuest is
the leading provider of customized Web-based managed account
platforms for financial institutions interested in moving their
representatives from commission-based to fee-based product sales.
Sarah_Anderson@fundquest.com.
Media: Sign
Up for Free Subscription to In-Depth, Financial Education Resources.
Members of the
media may contact Forefield.com to receive full time access to
Forefield's educational resources on financial planning topics.
If it's a financial topic that
a client would ask a financial planner about, Forefield has a written
explanation, many with illustrations, in their web-based, client-centric
financial planning and advice product. Forefield's information
is current, concise, compliant, and available to the media at
no cost.
Simply e-mail William Davenport at wdavenport@forefield.com to
be included on the permanent subscription list and you will receive
your complementary password shortly.
BACK TO TOP |